COR-2026-001 · v1.1
CorrectedCorrection
Corrected: comparative evidence is not a claim of factual equivalence
Earlier framing risked collapsing three distinct institutional records into one category. The object now states the limits of comparison explicitly.
Governing questionDoes the revised framing preserve difference while allowing institutional learning?
Sources, custody and correction
Moderation: Previous wording retained in the correction ledger.
Correction: Version 1.0 used “three examples of automated injustice”; version 1.1 uses “three institutional failures with different legal and technical facts”.
- Report of the Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme · Official inquiry
- District Court of The Hague judgment: SyRI Rechtspraak · Primary
- Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry record Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry · Official inquiry