Code, Law and Capital / Question
Where does each federal, state and judicial source of authority attach to a US digital-asset arrangement, and who carries the loss when the institutions meet at a boundary?
Public governing question · Discussion materials pending
Global Edition · Chapter 24: The United States: Federalism, Perimeters and Institutional Conflict
Recorded jurisdiction: United States
Proposition
A discussion proposition has not yet been published for this record. The question and any proposed answer will be identified separately.
Supporting sources
A discussion dossier with the passages relied upon and their relevance to the inquiry remains to be prepared.
Source contribution requirements →Competing arguments
No reviewed competing arguments have yet been published on this page. Contributions will need to identify the claim addressed and the evidence on which a different conclusion rests.
Attributed responses
No responses have been published. The contribution process is not yet open.
Response requirements and availability →Author clarification
No clarification has been issued for this discussion. Editorial review of a contribution does not constitute adoption of its position by the Author.
Other records in this book or edition
- When a digital-asset arrangement executes as programmed, how can a legal order identify who holds the right, which authority may act, and who bears the loss?
- How does a recorded event acquire authority over persons who did not write or operate the record, and what does that history teach about tokens and distributed ledgers?
- How can a digital-asset arrangement be described, before any legal label is applied, in terms of asset, activity, actor, infrastructure and control?